In honor of the end of 2014, here's a look at the Tax Extenders passed by Congress that were in effect for approximately 12 days before they expire at midnight tonight.
Happy New Year from your friends at Knapp, Craig and Rugg, P.A.!
Ruggnotes
Accounting and tax info for the common man, written by Ben Rugg, CPA.
In honor of the end of 2014, here's a look at the Tax Extenders passed by Congress that were in effect for approximately 12 days before they expire at midnight tonight.
Happy New Year from your friends at Knapp, Craig and Rugg, P.A.!
Last year I wrote a post discussing the tax benefit of buying a piece of equipment by 12/31. As I predicted, the depreciation rules were not extended at the end of 2013, and taxpayers marched into 2014 with no provision for bonus depreciation and only $25,000 of Section 179 available. But, thanks to Congress' call to action with the Tax Extenders bill signed into law December 19th, these great depreciation provisions are back for 2014.
Although it might not be too late to ring the register on a new capital acquisition for 2014 if you both need and have the funds to purchase equipment or other assets, the following information can help determine the impact bonus and Section 179 depreciation will have on your tax situation for 2014.
Bonus depreciation permits a taxpayer to expense 50% of the cost of an asset in the first year, plus normal depreciation on the remaining 50%. Bonus depreciation can only be taken on assets that are new or being used in a new way in the hands of the user. Simply, a new computer is eligible for bonus, but a used delivery truck that is purchased to be used as a delivery truck is not eligible for bonus. Bonus is "automatic", meaning that in order to not take bonus on new assets you must classify the asset as "used" or elect out of bonus, which must be done by class life. Bonus cannot be limited either by income or other factors, and bonus can put the taxpayer into a loss.
For 2014, taxpayers can elect to expense 100% of an asset in 2014 using Section 179. Taxpayer's can elect up to $500,000 of Section 179, but this amount is limited by taxable income and also by the amount of purchases eligible for Section 179 made during the year. The asset can be new or used. Section 179 cannot be utilized if the taxpayer does not have a profit, and any elected 179 that is unused is carried forward to future periods. Once a taxpayer has made $2 million worth of eligible purchases, the amount of 179 available is reduced. Unlike bonus depreciation, Section 179 is an election the taxpayer must make.
One of the methods above is not necessarily better than the other, because all taxpayers have different motives. But there are a few things to consider when accelerating depreciation:
Beginning in 2010, businesses have been afforded beneficial tax breaks via fixed asset additions and depreciation. These breaks are primarily Bonus depreciation and Section 179 expensing. Absent further action by Congress, Bonus is scheduled to go away and the 179 limits will be greatly reduced after 2013. Taxpayers can make an election to expense 100% of the cost of a new asset in the year of purchase under code section 179 of the Internal Revenue Code. This method, commonly known as "179", has both cost and income limits. In 2013, taxpayers can expense up to $500,000 under Section 179. If the taxpayer's acquisitions exceed $2 million, their allowable expense is reduced and the taxpayer's 179 deduction cannot exceed taxable income for the year. However, in 2014 the allowable expense drops to $25,000, with an acquisition limitation of $200,000.
Similarly, in 2013 taxpayer's can expense expense 50% of an acquisition up front, and then take normal depreciation on the other 50% for the year. For example, taking bonus on a $1,000 asset would result in a $500 expense up front, plus regular depreciation for the year on the remaining $500. It does not matter if the asset is new or used, there are no income or acquisition limits, and bonus can still be taken even if the taxpayer has no taxable income or the depreciation causes the taxpayer to have a net operating loss. But, in 2014, bonus depreciation will "retire".
Now that we've discussed the rules, take a look at this bad boy.
This is a fine bulldozer made by Caterpillar, one of the largest heavy machinery manufacturers in the world. Let's say that a taxpayer is in the market for this bulldozer and finds one at their local heavy machinery dealer with a list price of $250,000 (not actual list price, hypothetical only). We can now look at how making that purchase in December 2013 vs. January 2014 will affect the taxpayer's situation.
If the bulldozer is purchased in December 2013, the taxpayer can either expense 100% of the cost assuming they had < $2 million in total additions and taxable income of at least $250,000, or the taxpayer can expense $125,000 of the bulldozer under bonus depreciation regardless of their other acquisitions and taxable income.
If the bulldozer is purchased in January 2014, the taxpayer will not be permitted to expense any of the addition under 179 because their acquisitions will exceed the limit. The taxpayer will not be able to take any bonus depreciation either.
In this case, assuming a 39% tax rate, delaying the purchase to 2014 will cost the taxpayer savings in tax dollars of $97,500 if 179 could be taken, or $48,750 if bonus could be taken.
Although it is likely that Congress might pass some kind of extension to these depreciation rules, at this time there is no indication that the rules will be changed. Taxpayers that have been considering making fixed asset additions, from bulldozers to printers to office furniture, should take advantage of the tax benefits in 2013 while they last.